Liability insurers are spending less on defending claims, even as their losses mount – a divergence that could reshape strategies for MGAs, program administrators and wholesale brokers across the United States.
In 2014, liability carriers devoted just over 20% of losses to defense costs. By 2024, that share had fallen to 15.2%, a quarter lower than a decade earlier. Yet at the same time, liability loss ratios surged, climbing nearly 11 points to 60.6%.
It’s a paradox with big implications. A leaner defense spend hints at efficiency, but rising losses suggest that fewer legal dollars may not be slowing the tide of costly claims. Property and auto insurers, by contrast, saw their defense-to-loss ratios remain low and stable – under 5% – while their loss ratios improved in 2024.

The pressures on liability are structural. Complex litigation, sprawling discovery, and jury verdicts that climb higher each year keep the cost of losses climbing, even as insurers adjust their defense budgets. State rules – such as California’s requirement to fund independent counsel in certain cases – add further unpredictability.
For distributors and carriers alike, the lesson is clear: defense intensity is no longer a reliable signal of loss control. Instead, the decade’s data, distilled in Insurance Business’s Property & Casualty LOB Performance & Market Trends dashboard, shows where defense spend is thinning, where losses are mounting, and which business lines may demand a sharper pricing pencil.
The underlying report explores the decade-long shift in detail, benchmarking defense-to-loss ratios, direct defense spend and loss ratios across liability, auto and property lines. For those setting strategy in a market where litigation risk looms ever larger, the findings are hard to ignore.