The High Court has ruled in favour of Picture House Cinemas Limited in a dispute with its landlord, London Trocadero (2015) LLP, over insurance rent charges that included inflated broker commissions.
The case examined whether such commissions could be recovered from tenants under the lease terms.
Picture House Cinemas, which leases cinema premises at the Trocadero Centre in London, disputed the inclusion of broker commissions in the insurance premium charged by insurers and subsequently invoiced as insurance rent.
The tenant maintained that these costs were not recoverable under the lease, which required payment of a proportionate part of the premium “payable” by the landlord for insuring the premises. The court agreed, finding that the lease did not authorise the recovery of broker commissions and that the arrangements in question were not conducted at arm’s length.
The court previously ordered London Trocadero to repay close to £700,000 to Picture House Cinemas, representing the value of commissions charged over several years that were deemed not contractually recoverable.
The evidence showed that, in some years, these commissions made up more than 50% of the total insurance premium. This finding was significant in underlining the scale of additional costs passed on to the tenant, despite not constituting a genuine insuring expense for the landlord.
The case also resonated with broader scrutiny in the leasehold property sector, where similar practices have come under criticism. “Secret” or undisclosed commissions in buildings insurance have been the subject of ongoing investigation, with critics arguing they impose excessive and opaque costs on leaseholders and tenants alike.
Regulatory reports have highlighted that, over the last decade, opportunities to address these practices were missed, allowing them to persist.
The Financial Conduct Authority’s findings have also placed the issue in a wider regulatory context. Its data revealed broker-paid commissions as high as 62%, with over 30% being common. In nearly 40% of the cases it reviewed, freeholders or managing agents received more than half of the commission.
Such figures have prompted calls for greater transparency and alignment of these payments with fair value principles, particularly where the costs are ultimately borne by tenants.
The High Court ruling stated that only genuine costs incurred by the landlord for insuring the premises could be charged to tenants. As the commissions were rebated and did not constitute an actual expense to the landlord, they were deemed outside the scope of recoverable insurance rent. London Trocadero was ordered to reimburse Picture House Cinemas for the overcharged amounts.
While the decision may be subject to appeal, it has implications for both landlords and tenants. Landlords operating under industry standard leases that explicitly allow commissions to be retained, provided insurance premiums are reasonable and properly incurred, may not be directly affected.
However, under the Code for Leasing Business Premises, England and Wales 2020, landlords must disclose to tenants whether they receive insurance commissions.
For tenants, the case underscores the need to review lease provisions carefully to ensure that charges align with the terms agreed. Regulatory requirements also apply, with the Financial Conduct Authority mandating that brokers and insurers provide fair value to all parties, including tenants.
The judgment reinforces the importance of clear drafting in lease agreements to avoid disputes over recoverable costs. It also highlights the need for tenants to examine insurance and service charge invoices closely to confirm that amounts billed are consistent with contractual entitlements.
What are your thoughts on this story? Please feel free to share your comments below.
