Third-party litigation financing (TPLF) remains under scrutiny in Washington, with the American Property Casualty Insurance Association (APCIA) supporting legislative efforts aimed at increasing transparency and limiting foreign involvement in US civil lawsuits.
During a recent hearing titled “Foreign Abuse of US Courts,” held by the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence, and the Internet, lawmakers examined the growing influence of outside investors—particularly foreign interests—on federal litigation.
Subcommittee chair Darrell Issa led the discussion, which focused on how undisclosed financing arrangements could affect the integrity of the court system and potentially give external entities access to sensitive information.
APCIA’s senior vice president of federal government relations, Sam Whitfield, issued a statement backing the hearing and two legislative proposals linked to the issue. He said TPLF contributes to rising litigation costs, particularly in the area of non-economic damages, and these costs can extend to consumers and businesses, including through increased insurance premiums.
Whitfield said entities such as hedge funds, sovereign wealth funds, and other financiers are able to invest in lawsuits in exchange for a share of financial outcomes, often without disclosure. This practice, he noted, may allow funders to influence legal strategies or settlements without public awareness.
Two House bills are currently aimed at increasing transparency. The Litigation Transparency Act of 2025 (H.R. 1109), authored by Rep. Issa, would require disclosure of any third-party funding arrangements in federal civil cases.
A separate bill introduced by Rep. Ben Cline, the Protecting Our Courts from Foreign Manipulation Act (H.R. 2675), targets foreign involvement specifically. It would prohibit litigation funding by foreign governments and sovereign wealth funds, while mandating disclosure by any foreign individuals participating in such arrangements.
According to APCIA, these bills are intended to reduce the potential for undisclosed parties to steer the course of litigation for financial or strategic purposes. The association said it supports reforms that would provide courts, litigants, and the public with clear information on who is financing lawsuits and for what purpose.
Representing insurers in the home, auto, and business sectors across the United States and internationally, APCIA has been involved in industry policy for over 150 years. The group said it continues to monitor developments in litigation finance as they relate to legal and economic outcomes for the insurance sector.
Should courts require all third-party litigation financing to be disclosed—especially if it involves foreign sources? Join the discussion in the comments.
