Punitive, not protected: What Ofcom’s fine means for adult-sector underwriting

Ofcom’s latest enforcement action sharpens the line between compliance failure and insurable loss

Punitive, not protected: What Ofcom’s fine means for adult-sector underwriting

Professional Risks

By Bryony Garlick

Ofcom’s £1.35 million fine against porn company 8579 LLC under the Online Safety Act (OSA) may be a headline-grabbing enforcement action. For insurers, it clarifies something less dramatic but more consequential: regulatory penalties remain uninsured.

As age-verification rules move from guidance to enforcement, platforms hosting adult content face significant financial exposure for compliance failures. The insurance response, however, is structurally limited.

However large the penalty, the underlying principle in the UK market remains unchanged: punitive regulatory fines are not insurable, including those issued under the OSA.

Marc Loud, partner at Park Insurance, said the distinction is straightforward. “None of these fines are going to be covered under a liability policy anyway, because obviously in the UK market, any fines are generally uninsurable because they’re a punishment.”

The seven-figure exposure therefore sits directly with the operator. From an underwriting perspective, the boundary is unchanged.

Where policies may respond

That does not make enforcement action irrelevant to insurers. The financial impact shifts from the penalty to the cost of responding. “What you will get is the legal expenses cover to fight the case,” Loud said. In practice, enforcement is more likely to engage defence costs than indemnity for the fine.

Beyond defence costs, the exposure broadens into governance and systems oversight.  “I suppose there’s going to be more of a D&O and cyber issue. I think insurers now are just going to want more aggressive controls in place,” he said.

Those controls centre on demonstrable oversight - “more audit trials, documented compliance, and really senior management accountability there,” Loud said.

In that context, age verification becomes less a technical add-on and more a board-level risk control.

A constrained specialist market

The enforcement lands in a class that was already difficult to place. “Because it’s the adult industry we’re talking about, it’s a difficult market anyway. So the market’s been shrinking over the years,” Loud said.

Capacity remains limited. “It’s a very limited market. So there’s hardly anyone out there writing it at the moment. It’s few and far between on the insurers that write this type of business.”

For now, he is not seeing immediate structural shifts in limits or pricing. “I’m sure it will come, but it’s not like a commercial combined policy where there’s a legislation change and every insurance company is acting straight away.”

In a concentrated market such as this, regulatory change is more likely to translate into tighter underwriting scrutiny than wholesale wording reform.

Underwriting discipline under scrutiny

If enforcement under the OSA alters behaviour quickly, it may do so at the point of risk selection.

“When you’re writing this sort of business, you want to make sure you’re picking the right business,” Loud said. “We won’t want to write anything where they’re not following the new legislative procedures.”

In a class where appetite is already narrow, misjudging risk carries consequences. “That’s the problem when you pick up the wrong risk in a market that nobody wants, then you get a claim for it and the insurance companies run scared. Whereas if you’re picking up the right risks, then you can still write a good book of business out of it if you’re picking up the right business,” he said.

“Part of our checks will be making sure that they have got age verification and everything on that now,” Loud said.

The commercial dynamics of the sector remain intact, even as scrutiny increases. “There’s more and more people going into it,” Loud said. “Things like Only Fans and all this sort of stuff is really promoting the industry in a sense.”

What the Online Safety Act changes is not the scale of the market, but the compliance expectations attached to it.

Ofcom’s £1.35 million fine does not alter the long-standing rule that punitive penalties are uninsured. What it does alter is the visibility of compliance failure in a niche but lucrative market.

The penalty may sit outside cover, but the governance discipline required to withstand regulatory scrutiny now shapes underwriting decisions across the market.

Related Stories

Keep up with the latest news and events

Join our mailing list, it’s free!