Generally considered the oldest type of reinsurance, facultative reinsurance is an essential tool for brokers and insurers worldwide. It provides targeted solutions for unique or high-risk exposures that fall outside standard agreements.
Compared to treaty reinsurance’s blanket coverage, facultative reinsurance allows the primary insurer to transfer specific risks to a reinsurer on a case-by-case basis. By understanding the differences between facultative reinsurance and treaty reinsurance, brokers and insurers can better manage exposures and offer more tailored solutions to clients in diverse markets.
This article explores how facultative reinsurance works across different regions, highlighting its role and benefits in the insurance industry.
Facultative reinsurance is a type of reinsurance contract in which a primary insurer, also known as the ceding insurer or ceding company, transfers a single risk or a specific policy to a reinsurer for coverage.
Unlike treaty reinsurance, which covers a book of business or a portfolio of risks under a long-term agreement, facultative reinsurance offers flexibility. It allows insurers and reinsurers to negotiate terms for each individual risk. This approach is especially useful for high risk or unusual exposures that require detailed risk assessment.
Facultative reinsurance can be structured either as:
Facultative reinsurance allows insurers and reinsurers to negotiate terms for each specific risk. This approach provides benefits such as improved financial stability, tailored reinsurance coverage, and access to specialized expertise. This makes facultative reinsurance a valuable tool for managing exposures that fall outside standard treaties.
Facultative reinsurance is just one among several different types of reinsurance; you can always refer to our guide on the most common types of reinsurance to know more.
There are two main sub-types of facultative reinsurance:
In this type, the reinsurer assumes a fixed percentage of the risk and shares premiums and losses with the ceding insurer in the same proportion. For example, if the reinsurer takes 40 percent of the risk, it also receives 40 percent of the premium and pays 40 percent of any claims.
Facultative quota share reinsurance has been used for environmental impairment liability policies, especially for large industrial projects. In these cases, the ceding insurer may transfer a fixed percentage of a single, high-value policy to a reinsurer.
For example, if an insurer covers a chemical plant’s environmental liability, it might cede 50 percent of the risk and premium to a facultative reinsurer to manage its exposure and capital requirements.
In non-proportional or excess-of-loss facultative reinsurance, the reinsurer covers losses that exceed a specified amount, up to a defined limit. The ceding insurer retains losses up to that threshold, and the reinsurer pays only for losses above it. This is useful for protecting against large, infrequent losses.
Due to the rapid growth and unpredictability of cyber risks, many insurers have used facultative excess-of-loss reinsurance to cover large, individual cyber policies.
For example, an insurance company underwriting a major technology company’s cyber liability policy may seek facultative reinsurance for losses exceeding a certain threshold, such as $10 million.
This allows the insurer to manage its exposure to potentially catastrophic cyber events, which are often too volatile for standard treaty arrangements. The reinsurance and insurance industries may see a spike in cyber insurance business, as more small carriers are more exposed to cyber risk.
In fact, a recent report showed that 58 percent of leading P&C companies cited cyber insurance as both a business opportunity and a huge risk. These conflicting motivators are likely to become the main drivers of higher demand for facultative solutions.
Facultative reinsurance plays a critical role for brokers, who act as intermediaries between insurers and reinsurers to secure coverage for unique or high-risk exposures. Unlike treaty reinsurance, which operates under broad, long-term agreements, facultative reinsurance requires brokers to manage each risk individually.
Here are the steps that are typically involved whenever brokers provide facultative reinsurance to their clients. The process can typically be initiated by the ceding company and include these steps:
The primary insurer (ceding company) identifies a single risk or policy – often high risk or unusual – that cannot be covered under existing treaty reinsurance.
The insurer contacts a reinsurance broker to help place the risk in the facultative reinsurance market.
The broker gathers all relevant information about the risk, conducts a detailed risk assessment, and prepares a comprehensive submission package for potential reinsurers.
The broker presents the risk to selected reinsurers, outlining the required reinsurance coverage, such as quota share or excess of loss.
The broker negotiates contract terms, including coverage limits, pricing, and conditions, ensuring both the ceding insurer and reinsurer agree on the details.
Once terms are agreed, the broker facilitates the signing of the facultative reinsurance contract between the insurer and reinsurer.
The broker continues to provide support throughout the policy period, assisting with claims, endorsements, or any changes to the reinsurance contract as needed.
These two fundamental types of reinsurance have marked differences, and it is critical for insurance companies and brokers to understand them.
Facultative reinsurance covers individual, specific risks or policies, while treaty reinsurance covers a portfolio or book of business under a single, long-term agreement.
Facultative reinsurance requires separate negotiation and risk assessment for each risk, allowing for tailored terms. Treaty reinsurance operates under pre-agreed terms that automatically apply to all risks within the defined portfolio.
Facultative reinsurance offers greater flexibility, as insurers and reinsurers can accept or decline each risk. Treaty reinsurance is less flexible, as the reinsurer must accept all risks covered by the treaty.
Facultative reinsurance entails more administrative work due to individual risk submissions and negotiations. Treaty reinsurance streamlines administration by covering multiple risks under one contract.
Facultative reinsurance is an ideal mechanism for spreading high risk, unusual, or large exposures that fall outside standard treaties. It may be typically used as a long-term, primary reinsurance tool or strategy like treaty reinsurance.
Facultative reinsurance is applied more on a case-to-case transactional basis for managing specific risks. It’s particularly well-suited for large, unusual, risks that are beyond an insurer’s standard risk threshold. Treaty reinsurance is best suited for predictable, homogeneous risks that benefit from ongoing, consistent coverage.
|
Feature |
Facultative reinsurance |
Treaty reinsurance |
|---|---|---|
|
Scope |
Individual, specific risks or policies |
Entire portfolio or class of risks |
|
Negotiation |
Separate negotiation for each risk |
One-time, covers all eligible risks |
|
Coverage |
Selective, reinsurer can accept or decline |
Automatic for all policies in the treaty |
|
Efficiency |
Time-consuming, higher administrative load |
Highly efficient, less administrative work
|
|
Best-use case |
Large, unusual, or complex risks |
Routine, homogeneous, or standardized risks |
|
Flexibility |
Highly flexible, tailored to each risk |
Less flexible, fixed terms for all risks |
|
Documentation |
Individual contracts for each risk |
Standardized contract |
|
Cost |
Higher administrative costs |
Lower administrative costs |
There are a host of benefits and drawbacks to facultative reinsurance that brokers and primary insurers should be aware of.
Tailored coverage - insurers can obtain reinsurance for specific, high-risk, or unusual exposures that fall outside standard treaty agreements
Enhanced risk management - by transferring individual risks, insurers can better manage their overall exposure and protect against large or catastrophic losses
Improved financial stability - facultative reinsurance helps insurers stabilize their financial position by reducing the impact of significant claims on their balance sheet
Increased underwriting capacity - insurers can write larger or more complex policies than their own capital would otherwise allow
Access to specialized expertise - reinsurers often provide valuable technical knowledge and risk assessment for complex or emerging risks
Flexibility - each facultative contract is negotiated separately, allowing for customized terms and conditions to suit the specific risk
Time-consuming process - each risk requires individual assessment, negotiation, and contract drafting, making the process slower than treaty reinsurance
Higher administrative costs - the need for detailed submissions and one-off agreements increases administrative workload and expenses
Limited scalability - Facultative reinsurance is less efficient for handling high volumes of small or routine risks, making it best suited for large or unusual exposures
Potential for inconsistent terms - because each contract is negotiated separately, coverage terms and conditions may vary, leading to possible gaps or overlaps in protection
Capacity constraints - In tight reinsurance markets, finding a reinsurer willing to take on certain high-risk exposures can be challenging
Reliance on reinsurer’s expertise - insurers depend on the reinsurer’s ability to accurately assess and price the risk, which can introduce uncertainty if expertise is lacking
Here are some actual, real-world examples of successful facultative reinsurance agreements reported in the past few years:
As cyber risks have grown in scale and unpredictability, insurers have increasingly used facultative reinsurance to cover large, individual cyber policies.
For example, in 2024, several global insurers placed facultative reinsurance for high-value cyber risks, where treaty reinsurance capacity was insufficient. This allowed insurers to participate in the fast-growing cyber market while maintaining precise risk control and protecting their balance sheets from catastrophic cyber events.
While this type of reinsurance in cyber insurance is welcome, the market must evolve to handle increasing complexity and systemic risk.
Lemonade, an AI-powered digital insurance company, uses facultative reinsurance to protect against large individual losses and catastrophic events. In mid-2023, Lemonade renewed its reinsurance program, which included facultative agreements for specific high-risk exposures such as floods or major disasters.
This enabled Lemonade to underwrite more policies and expand into new markets while maintaining financial stability.
There are certain situations or conditions that warrant the use of facultative reinsurance instead of treaty, loss-occurring, or any other type of reinsurance. These include:
When a client’s risk is unusual, very large, or falls outside the coverage limits or terms of existing treaty reinsurance agreements, Facultative reinsurance is the more fitting choice.
Facultative reinsurance fits one-off policies or risks that require tailored solutions, such as insuring a major infrastructure project, a high-value property, or a complex liability exposure.
When the primary insurer’s treaty reinsurance does not provide enough capacity for a particular risk, facultative reinsurance can fill the gap.
For new or evolving risks (e.g., cyber, environmental liability) where treaty reinsurance may not yet be available or adequate, facultative coverage comes in handy.
Facultative reinsurance can better help insurers manage their capital, reduce exposure to catastrophic losses, or improve their financial ratings by transferring specific large risks.
Facultative reinsurance is appropriate when a client requires customized coverage terms, limits, or conditions that cannot be met by standard treaty arrangements.
Regulatory considerations for facultative reinsurance vary significantly across regions. Here’s an overview of the key requirements and differences:
State regulation: Facultative reinsurance is regulated at the state level
Credit for reinsurance: Ceding insurers can only claim credit for reinsurance if the reinsurer is licensed, accredited, or meets collateral/security requirements
Contract terms: Must comply with state insurance laws, including insolvency clauses and dispute resolution
Reporting: States require periodic reporting of reinsurance arrangements and recoverables
Local reinsurer preference: Countries like Brazil and Argentina often require cessions to local reinsurers first
Approval and registration: Facultative contracts may need to be registered with local regulators, and only approved reinsurers can participate
Currency and taxation: Cross-border payments are subject to foreign exchange and withholding tax rules
Federal and provincial oversight: The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) regulates federally, with additional provincial oversight
Admitted reinsurers: Facultative reinsurance can be placed with both domestic and foreign reinsurers, but foreign reinsurers must be registered with OSFI or provide collateral
Credit for reinsurance: Canadian insurers can only take credit for reinsurance with registered reinsurers or when sufficient collateral is provided
Contractual requirements: Contracts must comply with Canadian insurance law, including clear risk transfer and claims settlement provisions
Reporting: Insurers must report all reinsurance arrangements, including facultative contracts, to OSFI as part of their regulatory filings
Solvency and capital: Facultative reinsurance affects capital requirements and is included in the insurer’s risk management assessment
Solvency II (EU/EEA): Facultative reinsurance must comply with Solvency II, which sets out capital adequacy, risk management, and disclosure requirements for both ceding insurers and reinsurers
Freedom of services: Within the EU, insurers can place facultative reinsurance with any authorized reinsurer in the EEA without additional local approval
Contractual clarity: Contracts must clearly define risk transfer, claims handling, dispute resolution, and comply with local consumer protection and contract law
Reporting: Regular reporting to national regulators is required, including details of reinsurance recoverables and counterparty exposures
Non-EEA reinsurers: Additional requirements (e.g., collateral, equivalence assessments) may apply when ceding to reinsurers outside the EEA
Local retention requirements: Many Asian countries (e.g., India, China, Indonesia) require insurers to cede a certain percentage of risk to domestic reinsurers before placing facultative reinsurance with foreign reinsurers
Regulatory approval: Facultative placements, especially with offshore reinsurers, often require prior approval or notification from the local insurance regulator
Admitted vs. non-admitted reinsurers: Some jurisdictions restrict cessions to only “admitted” reinsurers (licensed locally), while others allow non-admitted reinsurers with certain financial strength ratings
Reporting and documentation: Detailed reporting of facultative reinsurance contracts and claims is typically required, with documentation sometimes needing to be in the local language
Foreign exchange controls: Currency regulations may affect premiums and claims payments to foreign reinsurers
Prudential regulation: The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) regulates reinsurance, including facultative reinsurance, for all authorized insurers
No local retention requirement: There is no mandatory cession to local reinsurers; insurers can freely access international reinsurance markets
Admitted reinsurers: Facultative reinsurance can be placed with both local and foreign reinsurers, but foreign reinsurers must meet APRA’s requirements for financial strength and reporting
Contractual clarity: Contracts must clearly outline terms, risk transfer, and claims handling
Reporting: Insurers must report reinsurance arrangements, including facultative contracts, to APRA as part of their risk management and capital adequacy assessments
Solvency requirements: Facultative reinsurance is considered in the insurer’s capital calculations and risk management framework
Local retention and admitted reinsurer rules: Strictest in parts of Asia and Latin America; Australia and Canada allow more flexibility but require foreign reinsurers to meet regulatory standards
Regulatory approval: Asia and Latin America often require more approvals or notifications for facultative placements than Europe, Australia, Canada, or the US
Solvency and capital rules: Europe (Solvency II), Australia (APRA), and Canada (OSFI) have risk-based capital frameworks; Asia and Latin America have a patchwork of national rules
Cross-border restrictions: Currency controls and tax rules are more common hurdles in Asia and Latin America
Freedom of placement: The EU’s single market, Australia, and Canada allow easier cross-border facultative placements compared to some Asian and Latin American countries
In summary, Australia and Canada are highly regulated, with strong solvency and reporting requirements. However, they allow significant freedom in placing facultative reinsurance with both local and international reinsurers, if those reinsurers meet regulatory standards.
This contrasts with stricter local retention and approval requirements in much of Asia and Latin America, and the harmonized but risk-based approach of Europe’s Solvency II. The US and Canada both focus on credit for reinsurance and regulatory compliance, but Canada has a more centralized federal oversight.
Check out our guide to the world’s largest reinsurance companies to know your options.
As some regions may update or alter their regulations, brokers and insurers must always check local rules, especially for cross-border placements, to ensure compliance and effective risk transfer.
Subscribe to Reinsurance Business Premium for exclusive access to industry insights, expert analysis, and other premium content.
