Travel insurers operating in New Zealand continue to exclude losses linked to war and armed conflict, while taking differing approaches to terrorism, civil unrest, natural disasters, strikes, and pandemics, according to analysis by personal finance website MoneyHub. The research reviews policy wordings from four underwriting groups that support most retail travel insurance brands sold in New Zealand. Across those products, claims arising from war, military operations, or similar hostilities are excluded in all cases. MoneyHub’s report finds that terrorism-related benefits are limited. It identifies one insurer that offers terrorism-related medical cover and another that provides terrorism-related cancellation benefits, subject to defined conditions. Most policies reviewed exclude terrorism-related events under both medical and cancellation sections.
The analysis indicates that all four underwriting groups provide cover for natural disasters, including events such as earthquakes, tsunamis, and severe storms. However, this cover generally applies only when the event occurs after the policy has been issued and when it was not reasonably foreseeable at the time of purchase. Timing is also relevant for civil unrest and industrial action. For disturbances such as civil commotion, travellers who are already overseas may have access to benefits such as curtailment or additional accommodation that are not necessarily available to those seeking to cancel before departure.
Read next: One in three Kiwis fly uninsured overseas
Treatment of airline strikes varies between underwriters. Some policies allow trip cancellation or additional expenses when travel is disrupted by industrial action, while others expressly exclude strikes from cover. “Most people assume travel insurance covers everything unexpected – it doesn’t. The single best thing you can do is buy your policy the moment you book your trip. Every hour you delay increases the risk that a breaking news event turns your unforeseeable loss into a known event that’s excluded,” Christopher Walsh, founder of MoneyHub, said.
The findings point to the central role of the purchase date when assessing claims tied to external events. Policies reviewed in the guide exclude losses where the triggering event was already public knowledge or reasonably anticipated when the customer bought cover. The report notes that buying a policy at or near the time of booking can reduce the likelihood that later events fall outside cover due to “known event” provisions. It also points to the operational importance of insurer advisories about emerging events, which can change how future claims are treated for newly issued policies. MoneyHub combines its wording review with a premium comparison based on more than 500 sample quotes across over 10 providers, and presents the material as reference information for discussions about non-standard risks with clients.
In a separate publication on cruise holidays, MoneyHub concludes that standard comprehensive travel policies often do not respond to a range of cruise-specific scenarios. These include confinement to cabin on medical grounds, missed port departures, unused pre-paid excursions, and certain incidents that occur on board. The guide states that many New Zealand residents take cruises each year without cruise-specific cover, including on itineraries with multiple foreign ports or voyages within New Zealand waters.
Once passengers are on a vessel, onboard medical services typically charge commercial rates, and standard public health system entitlements generally do not apply. The report notes that medical evacuations from ships can involve high costs. Helicopter transfers from remote locations can range from about $50,000 to more than $200,000, with uninsured passengers expected to meet these expenses themselves. “The most dangerous misconception is that a New Zealand coastal cruise doesn’t need travel insurance. The public health system doesn’t cover you on a vessel. The ship’s medical team charges commercial rates. And evacuation from remote waters is extraordinarily expensive,” Walsh said.
According to MoneyHub’s pricing analysis, premiums for cruise-specific travel insurance vary materially between insurers across New Zealand coastal, South Pacific, Trans-Tasman, and fly-cruise itineraries. The gap between the lowest and highest quotes is significant for all tested routes and traveller types. The guide also observes that older travellers may face tighter conditions for cruise cover than for land-based trips. Some insurers apply age caps or additional limits to cruise itineraries even when standard single-trip policies remain available at higher ages.
Cruise line-branded policies sold through travel agents or directly by operators are described in the analysis as convenient distribution options, but the report states that in some cases they are more expensive and provide narrower scope of cover than standalone New Zealand-issued policies. Taken together, the two MoneyHub publications offer insurance professionals a consolidated view of how New Zealand travel insurers approach low-frequency but high-cost events, with implications for product design, underwriting decisions, and client communication.
