The insurance industry is built on a promise: when something goes wrong, insurers and brokers show up. But in 2026 that promise is being tested in ways that have little to do with underwriting cycles and everything to do with social cohesion.
From the unsettling violence Australians have watched unfold at Bondi to the rolling churn of international instability - Iran’s tensions, Venezuela’s economic and political decay, even the strategic jostling now playing out across the Arctic north of Greenland - leaders are operating in a climate where trust is brittle and communities feel exposed. For brokerages, that matters. Your balance sheet might be national; your reputation is subject to profoundly local influences.
One way to help counteract the impact of political and social uncertainties and build up positive reputational capital could be more engagement with charity. Many insurers and brokers give to local charities but the strategy behind that giving varies. Steadfast New Zealand’s philanthropic model could be worth scrutiny by Australian CEOs: not as a feel-good sideline, but as an operating system for building durable community capital through the broker channel - without turning it into a marketing stunt.
Read next: Insurance senior team sleeping rough
Steadfast NZ’s Foundation has donated more than $1.4 million to more than 115 charities since 2018. The network’s 2025 convention also raised $51,000 for mental health charity partner I Am Hope. Those are not world-changing sums at a national level - and that is precisely the point.
Neil Cousins (pictured), Steadfast NZ’s CEO and a foundation trustee, described a structure that keeps power close to the community and away from head office “cause-washing.”
“All the applications are presented to us by our member brokers,” Cousins said.
That makes charity selection a by-product of brokers’ lived relationships - including schools, hospices, disability services, animal rescue groups, grassroots mental health initiatives - rather than a corporate committee trying to reverse-engineer virtue.
For sceptical executives, philanthropy can feel like reputation management or a compliance burden dressed up as kindness. Cousins admits he shared that suspicion at the outset.
“When we initially set up the foundation, I was a little bit skeptical about the corporate PR around these things,” he said.
The operational response was to stay deliberately small, targeted and understated. Steadfast NZ prefers regionally based, registered charities and steers away from large national organisations where small grants disappear into overheads. “Our grants are up to $10,000, that's a maximum,” said Cousins.
This can be a material intervention for a small organisation trying to fund a piece of equipment, launch a program, or keep a local service alive.
Cousins is explicit that branding is not the objective; in fact, he said Steadfast is “quite shy” about putting its name on the work. That restraint matters because it protects the credibility of the broker and the authenticity of the relationship. In a community, people can smell performative corporate virtue a mile away.
What could supporting charity look like as a disciplined leadership practice rather than a Christmas cheque?
First, use the broker network as the selection engine. Steadfast NZ’s model forces the organisation to back causes that already have community legitimacy, because the broker is personally connected - as a volunteer, a supporter, or an adviser.
Second, keep grants practical and project-based. Cousins’ emphasis on specific initiatives - equipment, hubs, expansion projects - gives leaders a defensible answer to the hardest internal question: what did the money actually do?
Third, share the funds and cap repeat grants. Steadfast NZ encourages reapplications but limits repeated funding, which avoids the trap of “set and forget” philanthropy and keeps the program dynamic and locally responsive.
Fourth, be honest about what it is and isn’t. Cousins said ESG and DEI reporting pressures haven’t driven their approach. That won’t be true for every Australian firm facing investor scrutiny, but the broader lesson holds: if the primary motive is compliance, the initiative will read like compliance.
Finally, frame charity as resilience infrastructure. In a jittery world, insurers and brokers trade on confidence. Community organisations - from lunch programs to mental health supports - are part of the scaffolding that keeps local life functioning. When brokers strengthen that scaffolding, they are indirectly strengthening the environment in which insurance can be sold, serviced and trusted.
Cousins put it plainly: “It is genuinely Steadfast really trying to give back into the community.”
The business case is not that charity makes you popular. It’s that, in a period of social and political volatility, brokers who are visibly woven into the places they serve will be the ones still standing when trust becomes the scarcest commodity of all.
