Succession planning is shifting from a background consideration to a central strategic issue for Australian insurance broking firms, with National Australia Bank (NAB) senior business banking manager Ian Theodore (pictured) highlighting owner retirement timelines, equity funding requirements, and a cohort of next-generation leaders seeking ownership stakes.
Research across professional services indicates that many firms are operating without a documented approach to transferring ownership and leadership. NAB’s Performance Era survey found that 58% of professional services firms, including insurance brokerages, do not have a formal succession plan, while 75% of business owners expect to exit their business within the next decade. For brokers, where ownership and decision-making are often concentrated among a small group of principals, this gap between anticipated exits and formal planning has implications for continuity, staff retention, and client servicing. Additional analysis from NAB’s private wealth arm suggests that owners are remaining in their roles longer than in previous cycles. Nearly half of surveyed owners are over 50, with 22% within five years of retirement, yet 46% expect to continue working beyond age 67. This pattern suggests some principals may be postponing decisions on succession, narrowing the timeframe available to design, fund, and implement transitions.
Read next: Insurer to slash hundreds of jobs
Despite softer business sentiment following interest rate increases, the segment of the economy that includes insurance broking has held up comparatively well, according to recent survey data. NAB’s latest Monthly Business Survey showed business confidence turning negative in February for the first time in nearly a year after the latest cash rate rise. However, finance, business, and property services reported business conditions above the national average in the February 2026 survey, even as other sectors recorded weaker momentum. Insurance brokers fall within this group. “Insurance brokers sit firmly within that part of the economy,” Theodore said. He said succession is generally easier to manage when day-to-day performance and balance sheets are stable. “The groundwork for a smoother and more successful transition is far easier to put in place” when firms are performing well, he said.
For mid-sized broking firms, the capital needed for internal equity participation can be a practical constraint. In brokerages with annual revenue of $10 million to $20 million, ownership stakes often involve capital commitments of $2 million to $5 million. Few prospective principals have immediate access to that level of funding. Banks and advisers are responding by using structures that link internal succession to the firm’s cash flow. These can include vendor finance, staged equity transfers funded through profit distributions, external debt supported by recurring commission and fee income, or models that combine internal buy-ins with partial sales to external investors or consolidators. “Staged ownership structures and financing arrangements built around the firm’s cashflow have made internal succession increasingly achievable for businesses that approach it with sufficient lead time. The barrier is not insurmountable. It simply requires planning that a reactive transition rarely allows,” Theodore said.
Brokers that have progressed their planning tend to treat succession as an ongoing program rather than a single transaction. In practice, this can involve aligning equity changes with governance and leadership development. Common measures include formalising shareholder or partnership agreements, setting clear criteria and timelines for equity participation, and establishing boards or advisory councils to separate ownership oversight from day-to-day management. For family-owned broking firms, there may also be a need to define the roles of family members in and around the business and to put in place mechanisms for decision-making and dispute resolution.
Survey data on Australian family businesses points to a generational handover on the horizon, with a proportion of first-generation firms expecting the next generation to become majority shareholders within five years and a larger group seeking increased involvement from younger family members in strategic decisions. This raises questions about how to match generational transition with technical and commercial capability in areas such as placement, risk advice, and claims.
Because insurance broking relies heavily on client relationships, the way those relationships are handled through succession is a core consideration. “Insurance broking is a relationship industry. Managing the transition of client relationships is often one of the most important parts of succession planning,” Theodore said. Firms that move early on succession often begin introducing prospective successors or future leaders to key accounts well before any share sale or leadership change is finalised. Approaches can include joint meetings, shared responsibility for client communication, and team-based account management models designed to limit reliance on a single individual.
Advisers describe succession planning as a continuing process that needs to be revisited as market conditions, regulation, and personal circumstances change. Typical elements include identifying potential successors, documenting roles and timelines, setting contingency plans, communicating expectations to stakeholders, and obtaining legal, tax, and financial advice on structures. With the broking sector currently operating in relatively stable conditions, financing options for internal succession available in the market and a group of prospective owners interested in equity participation, Australian insurance broking firms that have delayed succession discussions may use the current period to integrate succession planning into their broader strategic and capital planning.
